
| | Fast Focus |
 |
This looks to be the year for some federal regulation of
insurance.
|
 |
Holding companies and systemic risk are the most likely
targets.
|
 |
Opportunities abound for important measures to pass, but look
out for landmines
|
 |
Will insurance industry factions finally unite to ensure the
best results?
|
Barack to the Future
Will Obama succeed on insurance
issues where others have always failed?
By
Cheryl Arvidson
In the backrooms of Capitol Hill, where the deals are cut
and legislative language is hammered out, there’s a
saying that consensus in the insurance industry is like a
unicorn. Everyone can describe it, but no one has ever seen
one.
That may have been true for past insurance battles, but
there is a new urgency for consensus in the industry as 2009
dawns, a new Congress convenes and a new president takes office
against a backdrop of the most severe financial crisis this
nation has faced since the Great Depression. The federal
government has done the unimaginable—partially
nationalizing banks and insurers—and major stakeholders
expect tough regulatory reform to come next.
Will this force the insurance industry to do the heretofore
impossible and engage the unicorn? Nobody is making any wild
predictions yet, but key industry players certainly are making
noises about cooperation. In the past, reform
efforts—especially those that would have usurped state
regulation in favor of federal oversight—were stopped by
industry groups that “just said no.”
This time, however, there is a sense that obstructionism may
come at considerable peril because the regulatory reform train
is stoked up and ready to move down the track. If you
don’t get on board, you may just be left behind.
“We’ve had conversations, direct conversations,
with all of the major leaders in the House and the Senate and
also had some conversations with the current and incoming
Treasury team, and they have all indicated there is going to be
sweeping financial restructuring,” says Robert Gordon,
who spent 16 years as a top staff member of the House Financial
Services Committee before joining the Property Casualty
Insurers Association of America as senior vice president for
policy development and research.
“Many of those individuals told us very definitely
that insurance will be included. It won’t be optional
anything.”
“I think this is going to be the year,” agrees
Peter Lefkin, senior vice president of government and external
affairs for Allianz of North America. “I believe some
form of federal oversight and regulation of the insurance
industry is going to occur in 2009.”
Joel Wood, senior vice president for The Council of
Insurance Agents & Brokers, expects that at a minimum there
will be “an overlay of systemic risk regulation at the
federal level for holding companies.”
“I think we may be past this federal-versus-state
issue. Once it becomes clear that there is going to be a degree
of federal insurance regulation, most in the industry will have
to decide what we can live with and what we cannot,” Wood
says. “I am less concerned about this being a battle
royal within the industry itself, but it is combustible. This
is a very anxious environment, and anybody who says they know
what is going to happen is blowing smoke.”
Federal regulatory oversight for holding companies would
affect many of the major insurance companies.
|